26 Apr
2010
26 Apr
'10
9:23 p.m.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:13:47 +0100 Liam Girdwood lrg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
I don't see a need for own tree for plain sound/soc/omap/ patches but this could makes sense for patches that touch also arch/arm/ (we have had a few cases) or sounc/soc/codec/ (if we ever have such a need?).
This is not a cross tree merge branch or OMAP patch dumping area.
Everything is just carrying on as before except the upstream management effort is being divided between Mark and I. i.e. I'll manage the TI/OMAP based patches, Mark will manage the rest.
Yeah, thanks for clarifying. Makes sense to me. I was kind of fearing that are we creating some patch dumping area :-)
--
Jarkko