On Mon 26 Apr 2021 at 20:10, Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 4/21/21 7:05 AM, Jerome Brunet wrote:
Instead of using the clk embedded in the clk_hw (which is meant to go away), a clock provider which need to interact with its own clock should request clk reference through the clock provider API. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet jbrunet@baylibre.com
This patch seems to introduce a regression in our modprobe/rmmod tests
Really sorry about that :/
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/2870
RMMOD snd_soc_da7219 rmmod: ERROR: Module snd_soc_da7219 is in use
Reverting this patch restores the ability to remove the module.
Wondering if devm_ increases a module/device refcount somehow?
The driver is the provider and consumer, so it is consuming itself. This was the intent, I think the patch should be correct like this. Maybe I overlooked something on the clock side. I'll check.
I'm not sure the problem is devm_ variant, it might be clk_hw_get_clk() simpler variant which also plays with module ref counts.
I don't have this particular HW to check but I'll try to replicate the test with a dummy module and report ASAP.
Of course, I suppose the same problem applies to PATCH 1 of the series
sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c index 13009d08b09a..bd3c523a8617 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c @@ -2181,7 +2181,10 @@ static int da7219_register_dai_clks(struct snd_soc_component *component) ret); goto err; }
da7219->dai_clks[i] = dai_clk_hw->clk;
da7219->dai_clks[i] = devm_clk_hw_get_clk(dev, dai_clk_hw, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(da7219->dai_clks[i]))
if (np) {return PTR_ERR(da7219->dai_clks[i]); /* For DT setup onecell data, otherwise create lookup */