On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:34 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:22:19 +0800, Shine Liu wrote:
There's no restriction on that the runtime->period_size should be the multiplicator of the runtime->buffer_size in current kernel code.
So "hw_ptr_interrupt = runtime->hw_ptr_interrupt + runtime->period_size;" is not always the trueth.
The hw_ptr_interrupt is the expected position where the current irq is issued. So, the current code should be correct -- it's simply increased in the size of period_size.
Yes, the period_size and buffer_size I used was 0x800 and 0x3e80.
The log from the kernel is :
period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x809/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x1c, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x0 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x1008/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x809, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x800 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x1808/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x10e3, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x1000 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x2006/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x1808, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x1800 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x2808/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x203f, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x2000 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x3008/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x2808, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x2800 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x3808/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x30e9, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x3000 period_update: pcmC0D0p:0: pos=0x8/0x800/0x3e80, hwptr=0x3808, hw_base=0x0, hw_intr=0x3800 PCM: Unexpected hw_pointer value (stream=0, pos=8, intr_ptr=16384)
It's true that irq was issued when hw_ptr_interrupt is 0x800,0x1000,0x1800,...,0x3800,0x3e80.
But the irq last issued should be at 0x3e80, but not 0x3800 + 0x800 = 0x4000. The DMA engine loaded 0x680 frame not 0x800 frame at the last time.
In the snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr_interrupt function, hw_ptr_interrupt is caculated simply by increased in the size of period_size, but the runtime->period_size is not always consistent with the effective loaded size since the last irq. For example, the DMA engine loaded 0x680 frame when buffer reached the end at 0x3e80, and the irq issued.
I've encounter the problem of this bug, the kernel told me "PCM: Unexpected hw_pointer value (stream=0, pos=8, intr_ptr=16384)".
The period_size and buffer_size I used was 0x800 and 0x3e80 when the bug occured.
Following patch will fix the bug.
Does the problem happen with the latest driver code (as found in sound git tree or alsa-driver-snapshot)? If yes, we'd need more further analysis, e.g. by enabling some xrun_debug flags.
thanks,
Takashi
Signed-off-by: Shine Liu shinel@foxmail.com
--- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c 2009-08-14 06:43:34.000000000 +0800 +++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c 2009-08-19 17:59:00.000000000 +0800 @@ -248,6 +248,12 @@ hw_base = runtime->hw_ptr_base; new_hw_ptr = hw_base + pos; hw_ptr_interrupt = runtime->hw_ptr_interrupt + runtime->period_size;
- /* if the period_size is not the multiplicator of the
* buffer_size, the hw_ptr_interrupt calculated above* may not be correct, should be fixed.*/- if(hw_ptr_interrupt > hw_base + runtime->buffer_size)
hw_ptr_interrupt = hw_base + runtime->buffer_size;