30 Sep
2024
30 Sep
'24
8:16 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
The result from a call of the function “devm_kzalloc” was passed to a subsequent function call without checking for a null pointer before (according to a memory allocation failure). Thus return directly after a failed devm_kzalloc() call.
Feel free to ignore Markus, he has a long history of sending unhelpful review comments and continues to ignore repeated requests to stop.