On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
On 29/03/2024 11:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Depends on the first patch.
drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c index fcc5e8c08973..9fae8e396c58 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c @@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_gpio_driver = { .remove = virtio_gpio_remove, .driver = { .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.owner = THIS_MODULE, },}; module_virtio_driver(virtio_gpio_driver);
-- 2.34.1
Applied, thanks!
I expressed dependency in two places: cover letter and this patch. Please drop it, because without dependency this won't work. Patch could go with the dependency and with your ack or next cycle.
Best regards, Krzysztof
Dropped, and:
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org