On 12/9/18 3:33 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Since snd_hdac_display_power() can be called even for a HDA controller without DRM binding, lots of superfluous AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL checks in hda_intel.c can be dropped. This simplifies the code a lot.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de
sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 43 +++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c index 151c6ca85ec6..cacee33a74a8 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c @@ -948,9 +948,7 @@ static void __azx_runtime_suspend(struct azx *chip) azx_stop_chip(chip); azx_enter_link_reset(chip); azx_clear_irq_pending(chip);
- if ((chip->driver_caps & AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL) &&
hda->need_i915_power)display_power(chip, false);
display_power(chip, false); }
static void __azx_runtime_resume(struct azx *chip)
@@ -960,11 +958,9 @@ static void __azx_runtime_resume(struct azx *chip) struct hda_codec *codec; int status;
- if (chip->driver_caps & AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL) {
display_power(chip, true);if (hda->need_i915_power)snd_hdac_i915_set_bclk(bus);- }
- display_power(chip, true);
- if (hda->need_i915_power)
snd_hdac_i915_set_bclk(bus);
Question: I still see this 'old style' init in hda_intel.c even with all the patches applied.
/* initialize chip */ azx_init_pci(chip);
if (chip->driver_caps & AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL) snd_hdac_i915_set_bclk(bus);
is this intentional or a miss?