On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:44:11AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Current regmap has many similar update functions, but the difference is very few. This patch adds new regmap_raw_update_bits() and merge all update functions into it by macro.
This is a bit hard to review due to the way the diff comes out, it's not entirely clear what the code comes out looking like and I'm a bit nervous about what the gains might be since macro conversions often obscure things (this is making the macros undocumented for example). Creating the new function and then using it in a separate patch would be better.
+int regmap_raw_update_bits(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
unsigned int mask, unsigned int val,bool *change, bool async, bool force)
_raw specifically means something that works with the direct physical data format within regmap, a different name would be better.
- map->async = true;
- map->async = async ? true : false;
This is abuse of the ternery operator where a normal if statement would do, and it's also rewriting a bool into a bool so a simple assignment is enough.
/**
- regmap_update_bits_check_async: Perform a read/modify/write cycle on the
register map asynchronously and report if
updated
- regmap_write_bits: Perform a read/modify/write cycle on the register map
This looks like it renames update_bits() to write_bits()...
+#define regmap_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val) \
- regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, NULL, false, false)
+#define regmap_update_bits_async(map, reg, mask, val)\
- regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, NULL, true, false)
+#define regmap_update_bits_check(map, reg, mask, val, change)\
- regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, change, false, false)
+#define regmap_update_bits_check_async(map, reg, mask, val, change)\
- regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, change, true, false)
...but we don't seem to use it? The new name is also a bit confusing.