Re: [alsa-devel] Third time: Unlink PCM resource ?

Takashi Iwai wrote:

...

If this is the wrong mailinglist, then who should I contact regarding these erratic semantics ?

Which API are you using? A simple test case code would be more helpful to demonstrate.

The api provided by libasound. I'll see whether I can generate a concise example if there is no known solution to this problem,

But, in general, sharing the same DSP device among different processes don't sound like a good idea...

I agree, but when one forks off a child the parent pcm handle automatically passes to the child. If there is a possibility _not_ to pass the PCM handle to the forked process then I would be quite happy as well.

Werner,-