25 Oct
2013
25 Oct
'13
10:42 a.m.
On 10/25/2013 01:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
OK, I was asking because I was thinking of applying the patch for now; it's not that it's a bad idea it just seems like it's something that might might make sense solved at that level. Equally well I don't know if these systems will work with v3.13 anyway so perhaps it's not so urgent.
Yes, I don't see any urgent reason to push this hack in. Better to check dev_name change first. What I'm going to propose there is "spix.y" to "spi-INTABCD:xy" and "x-00yz" to "i2c-INTABCD:xy"
--
Jarkko