On 01/16/2014 09:44 AM, Xiubo Li wrote:
Makes the code slightly shorter
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li Li.Xiubo@freescale.com
I don't like this. I don't think it is a good design pattern to call devm function from within (especial non-devm) library functions. It creates an asymmetric API. The memory is allocated when snd_dmaengine_pcm_register() is called, but it is not freed when snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister() is called. This goes against the principle of least surprise.
- Lars
sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c index 5bace12..bfb012f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ int snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(struct device *dev, struct dmaengine_pcm *pcm; int ret;
- pcm = kzalloc(sizeof(*pcm), GFP_KERNEL);
- pcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pcm) return -ENOMEM;
@@ -408,7 +408,6 @@ int snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(struct device *dev,
err_free_dma: dmaengine_pcm_release_chan(pcm);
- kfree(pcm); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_dmaengine_pcm_register);
@@ -433,7 +432,6 @@ void snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister(struct device *dev)
snd_soc_remove_platform(platform); dmaengine_pcm_release_chan(pcm);
- kfree(pcm); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister);