20 Jul
2015
20 Jul
'15
11:42 a.m.
Sorry for this nit-pick and some time after you sent this patch. It's not a redo the patch" complaint, it's something that could be fixed later.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:34:05PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
@@ -131,10 +132,12 @@ static void au0828_unregister_media_device(struct au0828_dev *dev) {
#ifdef CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER
- if (dev->media_dev) {
media_device_unregister(dev->media_dev);
kfree(dev->media_dev);
dev->media_dev = NULL;
- if (dev->media_dev &&
media_devnode_is_registered(&dev->media_dev->devnode)) {
media_device_unregister_entity_notify(dev->media_dev,
&dev->entity_notify);
media_device_unregister(dev->media_dev);
dev->media_dev = NULL;
The indenting is slightly off here. It should be:
if (dev->media_dev && media_devnode_is_registered(&dev->media_dev->devnode)) { media_device_unregister_entity_notify(dev->media_dev, &dev->entity_notify); media_device_unregister(dev->media_dev); dev->media_dev = NULL; }
Aligning if statements using spaces like that is nicer and checkpatch.pl won't complain.
regards, dan carpenter