On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 13:45 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Look at the code you are editing here:
depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || MACH_SMDKV310 || MACH_SMDKC210)
depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110)Simply removing the dependencies is not going to give the clearly intended effect here. The dependency on the DT only machine needs to be replaced with something, not just deleted, otherwise the driver can't be enabled in Kconfig.
I interpreted commit 383ffda2fa as a commit that just removed a lot of stuff: see its commit explanation and its diffstat (it adds one line and deletes over 900 lines). Moreover, after that commit the references to MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210 both are nops. Deleting them can't possibly change anything.
But, anyhow, what would be the symbols to use here?
Also let me again remind you to submit patches with subject lines that are appropriate for the subsystem you're updating. I very nearly deleted this unread since it looks like a patch for arch/arm with no relationship with audio but in fact it doesn't touch arch/arm at all.
I do try to use subject lines that are used in the sections I touch. I seem to remember that you asked me _once_, I think one or two years ago, to adjust to the system used for SoC. Since then you've received a number of patches from me that, as far as I can remember, always used that system.
Besides, this patch was intended as a follow up to commit 383ffda2fa, to clean up two references it apparently forgot to remove, and therefor basically copied the subject line used in that commit.
Paul Bolle