4 Sep
2018
4 Sep
'18
5:03 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Should this be integrated into the Linux trace event mechanism rather than open coded? It would at least be nice to not call this a trace event buffer - when I initially read this I was expecting it to be for the standard Linux stuff which obviously it isn't.
Your right, I'll rename. The eventual aim is to make it more like Linux trace but we are constrained somewhat as some DSPs only 96kB or instruction RAM, hence it's a simple and raw trace infrastructure.
I was thinking the code could read it like it's doing now and then just have a trace event to dump it into the core trace infrastructure as it reads things in.