Sparse reports below warnings.
rt5616.c:1270:24: warning: symbol 'rt5616_aif_dai_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? rt5616.c:1277:27: warning: symbol 'rt5616_dai' was not declared. Should it be static?
These two symbols are just used inner the file, thus it's better to add static qualifier.
This commit adds it.
Fixes: b1d15059957d ('ASoC: rt5616: add rt5616 codec driver') CC: Bard Liao bardliao@realtek.com Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp --- sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c index f527b5b..98ae326 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c @@ -1267,14 +1267,14 @@ static int rt5616_resume(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) #define RT5616_FORMATS (SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE | \ SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8)
-struct snd_soc_dai_ops rt5616_aif_dai_ops = { +static struct snd_soc_dai_ops rt5616_aif_dai_ops = { .hw_params = rt5616_hw_params, .set_fmt = rt5616_set_dai_fmt, .set_sysclk = rt5616_set_dai_sysclk, .set_pll = rt5616_set_dai_pll, };
-struct snd_soc_dai_driver rt5616_dai[] = { +static struct snd_soc_dai_driver rt5616_dai[] = { { .name = "rt5616-aif1", .id = RT5616_AIF1,