On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:45:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:30:11 +0200, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
On Oct 18, 2019, at 16:18, Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:38:47 +0200, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
A driver may want to know the existence of _PR3, to choose different runtime suspend behavior. A user will be add in next patch.
This is mostly the same as nouveau_pr3_present().
Reported-by: kbuild test robot lkp@intel.com
It's confusing -- this particular change isn't reported by the test bot, but only about the lack of the CONFIG_ACPI ifdef.
Hmm, because the test bot asked to add the tag.
Yes, but it's only if you add a new fix patch on top of it. You can write some their credit, too, but basically it'd be enough to point to the Link tag to the thread.
If it's not appropriate will you drop it? I can also send a v7.
I can modify in my side.
Now I merged both patches to for-next branch.
thanks,
Takashi