* William Breathitt Gray vilhelm.gray@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:26:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
What's the practical motivation of this? What exact hardware is this for?
Thanks,
Ingo
The PC/104 bus is equivalent to the ISA bus regarding software communication. Many small form factor systems have a PC/104 bus where PC/104 cards may be stacked. Nowadays, these systems are commonly running 64-bit processors such as the Intel Atom.
I would like to utilize the ISA bus driver to support these PC/104 devices (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/7/418), but the ISA configuration option has an arbitrary X86_32 dependency. Decoupling the X86_32 dependency from the ISA configuration option will allow these PC/104 drivers to build for 64-bit architectures.
The existing kernel drivers which I intend to utilize the ISA bus driver in a X86_64 architecture for PC/104 support are the ACCES 104-DIO-48E GPIO driver, the ACCES 104-IDI-48 GPIO driver, the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 GPIO driver, and the Apex Embedded Systems STX104 DAC driver. I have several more PC/104 devices for which I wish to write drivers, but I would like to resolve this ISA bus driver situation before submitting new code.
Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so.
I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org
I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place?
Thanks,
Ingo