25 Feb
2012
25 Feb
'12
12:42 p.m.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:28:47AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Per discussion [1], the whole point we move to fsl_ssi is that we can reuse the DT support already in fsl_ssi. If it's something we should not use for IMX, I fail to see why we should make this move.
I was assuming that the idea was to share the code for device control as the same IP block was being deployed in the various Freescale SoCs - if the only thing they have in common is the device tree support it would be a bit strange to merge them.
Note that it's purely the bit where the machine driver is instantiated from the SSI (which is just one or two of several properties) that I'm talking about here, the bindings for the SSI itself look good.