Enric Balletbo i Serra enric.balletbo@collabora.com 於 2020年7月3日 週五 下午5:19寫道：
Hi Yu-Hsuan,
On 3/7/20 10:48, Yu-Hsuan Hsu wrote:
Enric Balletbo i Serra enric.balletbo@collabora.com 於 2020年7月3日 週五 下午4:38寫道：
Hi Yu-Hsuan,
Thank you for your patch
On 3/7/20 9:19, Yu-Hsuan Hsu wrote:
Log results of failed EC commands to identify a problem more easily.
Replace cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status with cros_ec_cmd_xfer because the result has already been checked in this function. The wrapper is not needed.
Nack, we did an effort to remove all public users of cros_ec_cmd_xfer() in favour of cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() and you are reintroducing again. You can do the same but using cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(). In fact, your patch will not build on top of the upcoming changes.
Thanks! But I have a question about implementing it. Does it look like the one below? ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, msg); if (ret < 0) {
In this case will already print an error.
What are you trying to achieve?
If the only reason is of this patch is print a message you should either, or enable dynamic printk and enable dev_dbg or event better use the kernel trace functionality. There is no need to be more verbose.
Example: $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/cros_ec/enable $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
369.416372: cros_ec_request_start: version: 0, command: EC_CMD_USB_PD_POWER_INFO 369.420528: cros_ec_request_done: version: 0, command:EC_CMD_USB_PD_POWER_INFO, ec result: EC_RES_SUCCESS, retval: 16
Cheers, Enric
Thank Enric,
The situation is that some users encountered errors on ChromeBook.
From their feedback reports, we only get the message like
'cros-ec-codec GOOG0013:00: ASoC: Failed to set DAI format: -71'. We know that -71 is -EPROTO but it is not clear enough for us to find out the root cause. That's why we want the detail of the result. Because the situation happens on users' side, it is not possible for them to enable kernel trace (ChromeOS does not allow users to touch kernel).
The other way we thought is changing dev_dbg to dev_err in cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status. But we are not sure whether it is also an error for other usages.
if (ret == -EPROTO) dev_err(..., msg->result) goto error; } I'm not sure whether it makes sense to check ret == -EPROTO here.
Signed-off-by: Yu-Hsuan Hsu yuhsuan@chromium.org
sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c index 8d45c628e988e..a4ab62f59efa6 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c @@ -90,10 +90,17 @@ static int send_ec_host_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, uint32_t cmd, if (outsize) memcpy(msg->data, out, outsize);
ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, msg);
ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg); if (ret < 0) goto error;if (msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS) {dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Command %d failed: %d\n", cmd,msg->result);ret = -EPROTO;goto error;}if (insize) memcpy(in, msg->data, insize);