25 Aug
2010
25 Aug
'10
12:43 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote:
Next step may be to support the 'amixer' like syntax for the control and mixer element handling.
Btw, we need to try and avoid using the control ID in any mixer syntax. I found that minor driver changes could change ID numbering meaning major updates to config files. The mixer names are pretty constant and using them has been quite painless.
Definitely. I meant the full control identifier (not just numid).
btw, have started any of the other API changes in use-case.c yet ?
I could make changes to the parser .....
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk