On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:53:15AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 04:32:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
+static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
[...]
- }, {
.name = "cpcap-led",.id = 4,.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",- }, {
.name = "cpcap-codec",- }
+};
With none of the entries containing platform_data /me wonders why you can't still use devm_of_platform_populate()?
Because devm_of_platform_populate works with compatible properties and cpcap-codec does not have one after I removed it for Mark.
Sorry, I missed that conversation. Why was it removed?
I had it in PATCHv1-PATCHv4. It was removed, since Mark didn't want to have it in the DT ABI.
Right, but why? Is it not a hardware device? I think converting from devm_of_platform_populate() for one sub-device is a bit drastic.