On 02-02-21, 20:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
My build tests failed to catch that amba driver that would have needed adaption in commit 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void"). Change the remove function to make the driver build again.
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Fixes: 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Hello,
I guess I missed that driver during rebase as it was only introduced in the last merge window. Sorry for that.
I'm unsure what is the right thing to do now. Should I redo the pull request (with this patch squashed into 3fd269e74f2f)? Or do we just apply this patch on top?
FTR, the test robot report is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/202102030343.D9j1wukx-lkp@intel.com
Best regards Uwe
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c index 67fb10885bb4..6cf1991a5c9c 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c +++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c @@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static int mhuv2_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) return ret; }
-static int mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev) +static void mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev) { struct mhuv2 *mhu = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
if (mhu->frame == SENDER_FRAME) writel_relaxed(0x0, &mhu->send->access_request);
- return 0;
}
static struct amba_id mhuv2_ids[] = {
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org