11 Sep
2007
11 Sep
'07
3:40 a.m.
On 09/11/2007 01:17 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Actually, the code with msleep() was basically OK. If more finer check is needed, it can simply use msleep(1). The point is to use timer_after_eq() instead of loop count for the precise timeouts.
Could you check whether the below patch works?
Works for me on ISA CS4231 (behind an AZT1605). Earlier Krzysztof suggested that 2 ms may be optimum, but I'll leave that upto him.
Acked-by: Rene Herman rene.herman@gmail.com
Zzz, Rene