At Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:09:08 +1100, Damien Zammit wrote:
Here is a patch based on for-next that does the job.
I haven't tested this particular merge on the hardware because I would have to recompile the whole kernel, but it does compile without warnings out of tree, and I haven't changed anything much from my version other than semantics to make it fit with your newer code.
Please find attached the actual patch in case gmail wraps my lines.
Thanks. Through a quick look, no serious problem is seen but could you fix the coding style? Try scripts/checkpatch.pl against your patch, and fix as much as possible.
Some errors like space around '&' can be ignored. Also 80 chars width warnings can be ignored. But most of other errors should be corrected.
Takashi