22 Dec
2016
22 Dec
'16
7:42 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
The name pmc_plt_clk_<n> follows the data sheet specification, where this convention is suggested: PLT_CLK[2:0] - Camera PLT_CLK[3] - Audio Codec PLT_CLK[4] - PLT_CLK[5] - COMMs
By the way, would I suggest to use same prefix as provider, i.e. pmc_atom_plt_clk_%d ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko