On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:36:53PM +0100, Daniel Matuschek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Matuschek daniel@matuschek.net
<snip>
pll_div->freqmode = post_table[i].freqmode;
pll_div->mclkdiv = post_table[i].mclkdiv;target *= post_table[i].div;break;
if ((mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE) ||((post_table[i].mclkdiv == 1) &&(mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_1)) ||((post_table[i].mclkdiv == 0) &&(mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_0))) {
Would probably be nicer to update the post_table to use the new defines and directly compare.
pll_div->mclkdiv = post_table[i].mclkdiv;target *= post_table[i].div;break;}@@ -388,7 +396,7 @@ static int wm8804_set_pll(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int pll_id, int ret; struct pll_div pll_div;
ret = pll_factors(&pll_div, freq_out, freq_in);
ret = pll_factors(&pll_div, freq_out, freq_in, pll_id);
This does feel like a slight abuse of pll_id, it feels to me that using the set_clkdiv callback would be a little more natural from a user perspective.
if (ret) return ret;diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h index 8ec14f5..0365177 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h @@ -58,4 +58,11 @@
#define WM8804_CLKOUT_DIV 1
+#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE 0 +#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_0 1 +#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_1 2 +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_0 WM8804_MCLKDIV_0 +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_1 WM8804_MCLKDIV_1
Do we really need two copies of these?
Thanks, Charles