Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-31 07:20:57)
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:25 AM, Codrin Ciubotariu codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com wrote:
On 31.05.2018 03:58, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:34:22PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
The I2S mux clock can be used to select the I2S input clock. The available parents are the peripheral and the generated clocks.
Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt index 51c259a..1c46b3c 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ Required properties: "atmel,sama5d2-clk-audio-pll-pmc" at91 audio pll output on AUDIOPLLCLK that feeds the PMC and can be used by peripheral clock or generic clock
"atmel,sama5d2-clk-i2s-mux":at91 I2S clock source selectionIs this boolean or takes some values. If latter, what are valid values?
This is the compatible string of the clock driver.
Ah, now I remember. AT91 uses fine grained clock nodes in DT. Is there still a plan to fix this?
I'm also interested in a plan.
compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-clk-i2s-mux";#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;How do you address this block? My guess is you don't because it is just part of some other block and you are just creating this node to instantiate a driver. Just make the node for the actual h/w block a clock provider and define the clock ids (0 and 1).
This block is not addressed, but its children are. The register we access in this driver is not part of other block. It's a SFR register, accessed through syscon and it has nothing to do with the I2S IP (see SAMA5D2 DS, page 1256, fig. 44-1: I2SC Block Diagram) that is the consumer of this clock. Adding a clock-id property in the I2S node would be just like v3 of this series, with the difference that we use clock-id instead of alias id to set the clock parent, which is not how you suggested back then.
I wasn't suggesting a clock-id property, but a clock specifier (i.e. make #clock-cells 1).
But AT91 clocks are all a mess, so I don't know what to tell you.
If #clock-cells of 1 works then we should go with that. It's still weird that we need random nodes to add more clks, but I guess that's how it's going to be for each at91 clk driver until it changes to be one big provider node.