12 Nov
2009
12 Nov
'09
12:18 p.m.
At Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:06:57 +0100 (CET), Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Takashi Iwai wrote:
IOW, I'm fine with an additional implementation for the dynamic beep on/off. But, the mixer interface doesn't look like the best interface to me.
I would prefer something which is comfortable for user. The module parameter or sysfs file is not a good way to explain users how they can change the beep behaviour.
A module parameter would be easy enough for most users who really care things like beep :)
We have basically four ways:
- module parameter (difficult tracking of changes through sysfs)
- sysfs file
- current implementation
- create new control with different name (like "HDA Beep Enable Switch")
3 and 4 have the same concern, so I'd vote for 1 or 2.
thanks,
Takashi