On 27.06.2019 10:43, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
External E-Mail
On 27 Jun 2019 11:00:01 +0900 Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com wrote:
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register, let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c index 042e593..9abf072 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c @@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ static const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config = { int atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register(struct device *dev) {
- return snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev,
&atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config, 0);
- return devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev,
&atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config,0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register);
void atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister(struct device *dev) {
- snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister(dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister);
Do we need to keep empty function?
Most probably not... Kuninori, let me know if you want me to remove atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister() from everywhere.
Thank you for your patch.
Best regards, Codrin