![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/be389a1bfb2870dcabd8e3d1251ce76c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
20 Jul
2013
20 Jul
'13
11:12 a.m.
On 07/18/2013 11:45 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
The accessory detect debounce work is not performance sensitive so let the scheduler run it wherever is most efficient rather than in a per CPU workqueue by using the system power efficient workqueue.
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com