18 Nov
2015
18 Nov
'15
4:51 p.m.
On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY.
Other way around.
Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid on a MEMCPY channel.
Arnd