22 Sep
2016
22 Sep
'16
12:45 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:33:47AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
In you patch 5/5 there is backtrace with flat cache, but I meant a backtrace with original RB tree cache code when warning about allocation being done in atomic context was generated.
I think the conclusion of this and some IRC discussion yesterday is that removing patch 5 fixes things - is that right?