![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5b19e9d0e834ea10ef75803718ad564b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:15:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I hope I addressed all review comments by now, so please pull this for linux-5.6.
A git branch with the same contents is available for testing at [1].
Arnd
I see no issue other than the timer API patch Ben pointed.
Could you resubmit that patch? Or just submit the whole as v8, I don't mind either way. Then we'll get this done for 5.6.
Can you take this as a pull request? That would be ideal for me, as I can then use it as a parent for a shared branch with additional cleanups on top (removing time_t etc) in linux-next. It also provides a nice place to preserve the series cover letter.
I'm sending you the pull request now, and the last modified patch, in case you prefer the patch over a git tag.
That's fine for me. Now I pulled it to a branch for 5.6 kernel.
Thanks for your patient works!
Takashi