On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Seungwhan Youn claude.youn@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Maintainers,
plat-samsung would probably be fine for that also - create a file called common-smdk or something. Some other things have gone for a plat-smdk style approach too, though I'm not sure how tasteful I find that personally.
Even though I would personally like to have EPLL control for a device in machine specific manner as part of its driver, I accept your opinion.
Claude, let us create one arch/arm/plat-samsung/smdk.c to do common stuff for SMKDs like EPLL control. What do you think ?
Actually if we add this file on plat-samsung, board-init will be separated two-part, one is machine(board) specific and other is all smdk specific. So, If it doesn't make confusion to other guys who wants to add settings for their features on board-init, it looks good to me. But I think that we also have to listen Mr. Ben Dooks and Mr. Kukjin Kim's opinion about this before we get a conclusion.
Hi all,
I think, basically it'd better if could control clock stuff in each driver for it when need it such as clk_get, clk_enable and so on. Actually there is no policy/protection for EPLL usage in plat-samsung or plat-s5p now and need to sort out other similar case for it also....so in my opinion, right now to proceed with the current style is helpful to me and will consider it in the future.
I wander to know that this is a last discussion, or more, and also know about finial decision. Of course, if we didn't get reached to the conclusion, we can talk more.
Can you give me a hand to finish this? :-)
Dear Mr. Mark and Mr. Jassi,
Now, I'm almost finished 2nd patch for submit except this audio clock setting. For now, I can only think that remove audio clock setting from this machine code, and add audio clock settings in arch later(may be after arch/arm/plat-samsung get EPLL policy as Mr. Kukjin said).
Is this okay?
BRs, Claude.