26 Nov
2012
26 Nov
'12
3:32 p.m.
At Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:24:16 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 11/23/2012 09:21 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
It doesn't make sense to calculate the delay for capture streams in the current implementation. It's always zero, so we should skip the computation in snd_usb_pcm_pointer() in the case of capture.
Shouldn't we add support for delay on the capture path instead? We could use the same frame counter to report the delay and resync when the urb is retired.
Sure, it must be possible like that way. Wouldn't you like to volunteer? ;)
Takashi