On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:00:54 +0100 "ext Mark Brown" broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 01:45:30PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
So what I mean that should I post the patch like as it now, rebased to dev branch of linux-2.6-asoc tree and with some minor changes, or wait a bit when all linux-omap and ASoC v2 evolve? What you think?
Whatever is most convenient for you. From the point of view of getting stuff in immediately it's best to base things on ASoC v1 though from an ongoing development point of view ASoC v2 is a better target if you can cope with any churn and hopefully we should be starting to push it into the kernel within the next couple of release cycles so if it's going to take a while to get the required BSP changes in...
I'll think I have to go for both :-)
The first ASoC v1 based version I would mostly like to see as an enabler for getting n different ALSA implementation we have in linux-omap tree to be ported for ASoC. Especially codec drivers. Or to have an another DAI link driver for EAC (Enhanced Audio Controller) found in OMAP2420.
The v2 I see also as mandatory path. We already do have boards with multiple DAI links and codecs: e.g. audio codec + audio link to bluetooth chip.
I'll simplify a bit my patch, base it to alsa-dev and post it here soon.