15 Apr
2019
15 Apr
'19
1:05 p.m.
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Takashi Iwai wrote:
The doubly unlock sequence at snd_seq_client_ioctl_unlock() is tricky. I took a direct unref call since I thought it would avoid misunderstanding, but rather this seems more confusing. Let's use snd_seq_client_unlock() consistently even if they look strange to be called twice, and add more comments for avoiding reader's confusion.
Fixes: 6b580f523172 ("ALSA: seq: Protect racy pool manipulation from OSS sequencer") Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de
sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
thanks, looks good now (this and rest of the clean-up series): Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Br, Kai