Hello,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegarcia@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegarcia@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Hans Verkuil hverkuil@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon August 6 2012 16:08:33 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-08-2012 10:58, Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegarcia@gmail.com wrote:
This driver adds support for stk1160 usb bridge as used in some video/audio usb capture devices. It is a complete rewrite of staging/media/easycap driver and it's expected as a replacement.
I just sent v8, but it looks it wasn't received by patchwork either.
What's going on?
The patch didn't arrive at linux-media ML.
Not sure why it got rejected at vger. I suggest you to ping vger admin to see why your patches are being rejected there.
I tested parsing this patch manually and patchwork accepted. So, once the issue with vger is solved, other patches should be properly handled there.
Could it be related to the fact that a gmail account is used? Konke Radlow had a similar issue recently when he posted a patch from a gmail account. It worked fine when posted from a company account.
FWIW, I've always sent my patches from git-send-email through my gmail account. Don't know if this is an issue, but it never seemed to.
On a second thought, perhaps it makes sense to have a git repo (on linuxtv.org) for me to work on stk1160. That way I could simply send "git pull" requests instead of patches.
I'm not sure if this is a better workflow and/or would allow for easier reviewing.
Well, I just got an answer from vger administrator. He told me the patch was exceeding the allowed limit. Which I later discovered it was documented here:
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Apparently, there is a 100, 000 characters limit.
So, how do we proceed?
Regards, Ezequiel.