On 02-02-21, 10:52, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 2/1/21 10:39 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 01-02-21, 10:18, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 2/1/21 4:38 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 01-02-21, 15:58, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 26-01-21, 16:37, Bard Liao wrote:
struct sdw_master_prop { u32 revision; @@ -421,8 +422,11 @@ struct sdw_master_prop { u32 err_threshold; u32 mclk_freq; bool hw_disabled;
- u32 quirks;
Can we do u64 here please.. I dont know where we would end up.. but would hate if we start running out of space ..
No objection.
Also, is the sdw_master_prop right place for a 'quirk' property. I think we can use sdw_master_device or sdw_bus as this seems like a bus quirk..?
It's already part of sdw_bus
Right, but the point is that the properties were mostly derived from DiSco, so am bit skeptical about it adding it there..
Oh, I am planning to contribute such quirks as MIPI DisCo properties for the next revision of the document (along with a capability to disable a link). This was not intended to remain Linux- or Intel-specific.
Okay lets keep it in properties then