At Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:07:31 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:31:16 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
Hi Takashi,
Do you plan to make hda-verb, hda-analyzer, hda-emu and/or codecgraph a part of alsa-tools/alsa-utils/pyalsa in the future?
I'm asking because I would like to know if it makes sense to package them separately for Debian.
I can put hda-emu to alsa-tools if anyone wants. This is a really small code. (But I didn't put it because I didn't want to 100 times bigger auto-tools stuff for it :)
But, hda-emu doesn't suit with alsa-tools category. It's a tool to be built with the latest (or the version to be tested) sound kernel tree. So, it's not much worth to package.
hda-analyzer is already in alsa.git. I guess it depends on Jaroslav.
What about an idea to move all hda related stuff to new git repository like alsa-hda-tools ? It will make packaging more easy with uniform name and developers will find all recent stuff at one place.
Well, hda-emu shouldn't be packaged together, so I'd like to keep it separately. So, what else? hda-verb and hda-analyzer? hda-verb hasn't been updated since long time ago :)
Takashi