On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 14:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
[External]
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:13:26AM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:26 +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 15:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
-static const char * const phy_types[] = {
"emmc 5.0 phy","emmc 5.1 phy"-};
enum xenon_phy_type_enum { EMMC_5_0_PHY, EMMC_5_1_PHY, NR_PHY_TYPES
There is no need for NR_PHY_TYPES now so you could remove that as well.
I thought the same. The only reason to keep NR_PHY_TYPES, is for potential future patches, where it would be just 1 addition
enum xenon_phy_type_enum { EMMC_5_0_PHY, EMMC_5_1_PHY,
EMMC_5_2_PHY, NR_PHY_TYPESDepending on style/preference of how to do enums (allow comma on last enum or not allow comma on last enum value), adding new enum values woudl be 2 additions + 1 deletion lines.
enum xenon_phy_type_enum { EMMC_5_0_PHY,
EMMC_5_1_PHY
EMMC_5_1_PHY,
EMMC_5_2_PHY}
Either way (leave NR_PHY_TYPES or remove NR_PHY_TYPES) is fine from my side.
Preference on this ? If no objection [nobody insists] I would keep.
I don't feel strongly about it [dropping NR_PHY_TYPES or not].
If you end up resending the series could you remove it, but if not then it's not worth it.
ack
thanks Alex
regards, dan carpenter