4 Apr
2014
4 Apr
'14
11:52 p.m.
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Brian Austin wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you added CS42L52_CHIP_REV_MASK and then replaced that define with CS42L52_CHIP_REV_B1?
I think some changes to actually display the correct rev_id based on the return value of the reg_read would be cool but this isn't it IMO. I don't think it will be either.
s/be/build/