27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
2:16 a.m.
On 09/23/2013 05:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:19:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2013 02:54 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
+Required properties: +- compatible: should be "linux,simple-codec".
We shouldn't have any Linux-specific bindings. It might be reasonable to define a binding for a "simple CODEC", but there's no reason it should be Linux-specific.
What's the vendor prefix to use then? The same thought did occur to me but I wasn't sure what to suggest instead.
For other non-vendor-specific/generic bindings, we've simply omitted the vendor prefix from the compatible value, e.g.: gpio-keys, i2c-gpio, regulator-fixed, etc.