On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 20:27 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
Okay catching up on this thread now..
So I don't think FW name would help, if required we should add dev_info to print the firmware which is getting loaded.
Now, since we have topology we should comprehend that as well. The topology files essentially change the DSP graph and hence would required different UCM settings so that should be added to name too. Same hardware with different graph will need different settings..
And while thinking for it, I think it might be good to separate the SoC and codec settings and in UCM setting for card specify the combination. That may avoid duplicate codec setting all over the place for different combination. I don't know if UCM supports that...
That's the plan :)
The intention is to make UCM machine specific rather than driver specific configuration. Han is going to add #include and #define like support to UCM in order to facilitate a library of codec UCM files that can be included into machine UCM configs.
Liam
Thanks