11 Mar
2014
11 Mar
'14
12:21 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:18:30AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
On 10/03/14 23:40, Mark Brown wrote:
Two things here. One is that this should be a dev_err() and the other is that if this is worth doing shouldn't it just be in the core - I see nothing driver specific here?
Sorry, didn't see a device in "struct snd_soc_codec *codec" so I went for a printk (although it was pr_info instead of pr_err).
codec->dev.
If you think that changing the two snd_soc calls to print errors when anything bad happens then that would also be a good idea then I can send a patch for that.
That would be better, yes.