At Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
On 03-07-08 12:07, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:14:11 +0200, Krzysztof Helt wrote:
Another step toward unification of all WSS compatible chips handling.
Right, and without the unification, these patches have little merits. So far, it's more addition than deletion in total. [Your work is greatly appreciated, of course. I just want to tell that it can't be applied alone without the unification.]
Yes these should probably grow as a series with somewhat of a (semi-) final result being apparent after applying patch N of N. I'm importing Krzysztof' patches into a "wss" branch in my local git tree and will be testing them as they come in though -- and frankly, I think it's better if they come in as he does them a few at a time rather than a large number at once as it's easier for review purposes.
Well, I can keep it in a branch if you prefer. Just let me know.
(by the way, Krzysztof, if them not being applied immediately anyway means you'd rather work the series against for example current mainline that's fine by me as well)
BTW, the first patch seems too big for ML, and it can't be applied as is (wss.h doesn't exist, etc), in addition to missing Kconfig and Makefile changes. Could you fix and split to several patches?
They depended on his first two patches:
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-June/008766.html http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-June/008669.html
But as far as I'm concerned you could just sit back until the series is somewhat "complete".
OK. As 2.6.26 will come out soon, it's a bit too late to include such a big change for 2.6.27. So we have still some time :)
thanks,
Takashi