On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:14:53PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li Li.Xiubo@freescale.com
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt | 8 ++++---- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 6 +++--- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt index aed1f21..e25ef38 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ Required properties: See ../pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property values.
- big-endian: Boolean property, required if all the SAI device registers are big-endian rather than little-endian.
-- big-endian-data: If this property is absent, the little endian mode will
- be in use as default, or the big endian mode will be in use for all the
- fifo data.
+- msb-first: Configures whether the LSB or the MSB is transmitted first for
- the fifo data. If this property is absent, the LSB is transmitted first as
- default, or the MSB is transmitted first.
- fsl,sai-synchronous-rx: This is a boolean property. If present, indicating that SAI will work in the synchronous mode (sync Tx with Rx) which means both the transimitter and receiver will send and receive data by following
@@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ sai2: sai@40031000 { dmas = <&edma0 0 VF610_EDMA_MUXID0_SAI2_TX>, <&edma0 0 VF610_EDMA_MUXID0_SAI2_RX>; big-endian;
big-endian-data;
msb-first;
}; diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c index a6eb784..4e48431 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int fsl_sai_set_dai_fmt_tr(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai, bool tx = fsl_dir == FSL_FMT_TRANSMITTER; u32 val_cr2 = 0, val_cr4 = 0;
- if (!sai->big_endian_data)
- if (!sai->is_msb_first) val_cr4 |= FSL_SAI_CR4_MF;
IIRC, MF stands for 'MSB First' but the condition is !is_msb_first..
And also we can't not simply inverse the condition here since those platforms without the original 'big_endian_data' property will be broken unless they add the new 'is_msb_first' into the DT bindings, which is, however, a violation due to breaking the old bindings.
So I guess is_lsb_first might be better here?
And actually, Xiubo, what's your purpose to add this patch? I can't see any commit comments to explain the reason. So could you please say something about it?
Thanks Nicolin