Hi Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela
We encountered an issue in the pcm_dsnoop use case, could youplease help to have a look?
*Issue description:* With two instances for dsnoop type device running in parallel,after suspend/resume, one of the instances will be hung in memcpy because the very large copy size is obtained.
#3 0x0000ffffa78d5098 in snd_pcm_dsnoop_sync_ptr
(pcm=0xaaab06563da0)
at pcm_dsnoop.c:158 dsnoop = 0xaaab06563c20 slave_hw_ptr = 64 old_slave_hw_ptr = 533120 avail = *187651522444320*
- Reason analysis: *
The root cause that I analysis is that after suspend/resume, one instance will get the SND_PCM_STATE_SUSPENDED state from slave pcm
device,
then it will do snd_pcm_prepare() and snd_pcm_start(), which will reset the dsnoop->slave_hw_ptr and the hw_ptr of slave pcm device, then the state of this instance is correct. But another instance may not get the SND_PCM_STATE_SUSPENDED state from slave pcm device because slave device may have been recovered by first instance, so the dsnoop->slave_hw_ptr is not reset. but because hw_ptr of slave pcm device has been reset, so there will be a very large "avail" size.
*Solution:* I didn't come up with a fix for this issue, seems there is no easy way to let another instance know this case and reset the dsnoop->slave_hw_ptr, could you please help?
Could you try topic/pcm-direct-resume branch on
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub .com%2Ftiwai%2Falsa- lib&data=04%7C01%7Cshengjiu.wang%40nxp.com%7C95f97de3f2c840d 9853508d9fd2e79ea%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C 637819198319430045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM DAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdat a=WWX1ZlcQhJF3pHJdHPIH%2B0xG9o%2FjQnHG5fHDbKXwQwE%3D&r eserved=0
Thanks, I push my test result in https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-lib/issues/213 Could you please review?
Best regards Wang shengjiu