I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/isa/azt2320.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/isa/azt2320.c b/sound/isa/azt2320.c index fff186f..1b15a38 100644 --- a/sound/isa/azt2320.c +++ b/sound/isa/azt2320.c @@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static int mpu_irq[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IRQ; /* Pnp setup */ static int dma1[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* PnP setup */ static int dma2[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* PnP setup */
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for azt2320 based soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for azt2320 based soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable azt2320 based soundcard.");
struct snd_card_azt2320 {