On Thursday 11 of July 2013 14:01:39 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Thursday 11 of July 2013 12:20:23 Mark Brown wrote:
This is a bit of a larger project sadly, there was resistance to doing the DT bindings based on compatible strings using the IP version :(
I'm not sure if this case is related to this problem in any way. I just suggested introducing a new include like samsung,exynos5420-i2s, a opposed to using samsung,exynos5250-i2s and adding flags, since the I2S in Exynos5420 is
Well, it *should* be samsung,i2s-vN where N is the version number of the IP but documentation on the versioning has been patchy hence this whole thinng.
Oh, the binding for samsung-i2s uses IP versions. Isn't that slightly broken?
At least with Samsung bindings, I think we happened to agree on a single convention of naming compatible values after the first SoC in which such block first appeared.
I wonder what happened with this i2s binding that made it end up outside this convention.
the first one to have this TDM or whatever mode. (I'd still like to hear what it is...)
What it *should* be is the option to send more than one audio stream down a link using time division multiplexing.
OK.
Best regards, Tomasz