On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 05:35:22AM +0800, 慕冬亮 wrote:
diff --git a/sound/core/control_led.c b/sound/core/control_led.c index 25f57c14f294..dd357abc1b58 100644 --- a/sound/core/control_led.c +++ b/sound/core/control_led.c @@ -740,6 +740,7 @@ static int __init snd_ctl_led_init(void) for (; group > 0; group--) { led = &snd_ctl_leds[group - 1]; device_del(&led->dev);
device_put(&led->dev); } device_del(&snd_ctl_led_dev); return -ENOMEM;
@@ -768,6 +769,7 @@ static void __exit snd_ctl_led_exit(void) for (group = 0; group < MAX_LED; group++) { led = &snd_ctl_leds[group]; device_del(&led->dev);
} device_del(&snd_ctl_led_dev); snd_ctl_led_clean(NULL);device_put(&led->dev);
Does this patch mean I should add device_put in the init and exit function other than snd_ctl_led_sysfs_remove? This will cause device_release bypass the release method checking?
Please fix your email client to line wrap your emails.
I'm not sure what release method checking you're refering to.
regards, dan carpenter